Wie man Infos im Internet findet

Een piramidespel waarin „iemand zal worden verbrand“ of een „opwindende innovatie?“ Is dit het jaar van het niet-tastbare token?

In een wervelende periode van zeven dagen, die begon met Twitter-oprichter Jack Dorsey die bewees dat bijna alles kan worden tokenized – zelfs zijn oude tweets – en op donderdag culmineerde met een kunstveiling van Christie’s die een verbijsterend bod van $ 69,3 miljoen opleverde voor een tokenized Beeple werk – meer op een veiling ophalen dan stukken van George Seurat, Paul Gaugain of Salvador Dalí – vroegen sommige waarnemers: lopen niet- tastbare tokens uit de hand ?

Zelfs voordat het legendarische veilinghuis kunstenaar Mike Winkelmann, alias Beeple, katapulteerde in het verheven gezelschap van Jeff Coons en David Hockney – dat wil zeggen levende kunstenaars die stratosferische prijzen voor hun werken konden afdwingen – trokken sommigen de gezonde verstand van de markt in twijfel. Marketinggoeroe en auteur Seth Godin, bijvoorbeeld, schreef in een blogpost:

„NFT’s zijn een gevaarlijke valstrik“, en de huidige manie is „een ongereguleerde, niet-transparante drukte met overal een ‚bubbel‘ geschreven.“

Ondertussen werd op 8 maart een NFT-versie van een opzettelijk verbrand Banksy- schilderij voor bijna $ 400.000 verkocht op marktplaats OpenSea, wat Zavier Ellis, directeur van een Londense galerie, ertoe aanzette om The Telegraph in het Verenigd Koninkrijk te vertellen : van piramideverkoop waar uiteindelijk iemand zal worden verbrand. “ David Knowles, die een kunstadviesbureau, Artelier, runt, merkte op dat het kopen van hedendaagse kunst over het algemeen riskant is, maar het kopen van niet-tastbare penningen lijkt het ‚extreme einde‘ hiervan te zijn.

Na zo’n week is het de vraag: borrelt de NFT-markt over, en zo ja, zullen er mensen gekwetst worden ?

Op weg naar een val?

„NFT’s zijn een opwindende innovatie“, vertelde Fabian Schär, professor op de afdeling bedrijfskunde en economie aan de Universiteit van Basel, aan CoinTelegraph, „maar dat betekent niet dat elke doodle plotseling waardevol is, alleen omdat hij wordt weergegeven door een ERC-721 of ERC-1155 token, ”toe te voegen:

„Er zijn een aantal interessante projecten, en ze zullen waarschijnlijk hier blijven, maar de overgrote meerderheid van NFT’s zal volledig waardeloos zijn als de hype voorbij is.“

„Ik zou niet zeggen dat de dingen uit de hand lopen, maar NFT’s lijken de huidige trend te zijn geworden, en zoveel opportunisten springen op de kar in de hoop snel geld te verdienen“, zegt Gary Bracey, mede-oprichter en CEO van Terra Virtua, vertelde Cointelegraph. „Ik ben bang voor de oververzadiging van middelmatige producten en nieuwkomers die niets innovatiefs of anders aan het feest brengen.“

Wat zou deze speculatie kunnen drijven? Misha Libman, mede-oprichter van kunstmarktplaats Snark.art, vertelde Cointelegraph: “De stijgende prijzen zijn gebonden aan het feit dat regeringen triljoenen dollars in de wereldeconomie pompen om de schade veroorzaakt door de pandemie tegen te gaan. bord.“

Veroorzaken bellen meestal enige schade als ze barsten? Antwoordde Bracey: „Ik zou graag willen denken dat mensen slimmer zijn dan dat en niet zullen vallen voor een van de ‚Emperor’s New Clothes‘ shenanigans.“ De hele NFT-gemeenschap zou negatief worden beïnvloed als dingen zouden barsten, stelde Libman voor en voegde eraan toe:

„Maar ik denk dat het belangrijk is om op te merken dat de huidige aandacht en investeringen die de sector binnenstromen ook helpen bij het bouwen van de broodnodige infrastructuur en tools die het gemakkelijker en goedkoper maken om projecten te bouwen die gebruikmaken van de blockchain-technologie.“

• El Bitcoin está cotizando dentro de un canal ascendente paralelo de corto plazo.
• Los indicadores técnicos se han vuelto alcistas.
• BTC está probablemente en la quinta y última onda de un impulso alcista.

El precio de Bitcoin (BTC) finalmente ha logrado romper un importante nivel de resistencia en $52,500.

Se espera que el Bitcoin Trader siga subiendo hasta los $57,000 y que potencialmente pueda alcanzar un nuevo precio máximo histórico después.

Bitcoin intenta revertirse

El BTC ha estado subiendo desde que rebotó en el nivel de soporte de 44.500 dólares el 28 de febrero. Mientras que el movimiento alcista parecía haberse estancado el 3 de marzo, BTC creó una fuerte vela alcista el 8 de marzo. Hoy ha vuelto a superar el máximo del 3 de marzo.

Los indicadores técnicos se han vuelto completamente alcistas. El RSI ha rebotado claramente en la línea 50 y el oscilador estocástico ha comenzado a girar al alza. Actualmente está cerca de realizar un cruce alcista.

Además, el MACD ha dado señales de reversión alcista. Las dos veces anteriores que esto ocurrió (flechas verdes), el MACD cruzó a territorio positivo e inició un movimiento alcista significativo. Por lo tanto, es posible que esta vez ocurra lo mismo.

Movimiento a corto plazo

El gráfico de seis horas muestra una ruptura en curso por encima del nivel de retroceso de 0,618 Fib en $52.500. Esto es crucial, ya que BTC ha estado operando por debajo de esta línea desde el 24 de febrero.

El nivel de 0,618 Fib a menudo actúa como la parte superior de los retrocesos después de una fuerte caída. Por lo tanto, recuperarlo es una señal muy positiva. Además, tanto el MACD como el RSI están aumentando.

El gráfico de dos horas muestra que BTC está operando potencialmente dentro de un canal paralelo. Actualmente, acaba de moverse por encima del canal y ha invalidado numerosas divergencias bajistas potenciales.

Por lo tanto, es probable que la tendencia a corto plazo también sea alcista. Sin embargo, el movimiento contenido dentro de los canales paralelos suele ser correctivo. Si BTC fuera rechazado por la línea de resistencia del canal cerca de $57,000, podría sugerir que le espera otro mínimo.

Por otro lado, una ruptura por encima de este canal probablemente llevaría a BTC hacia un nuevo máximo histórico. En cualquiera de los casos, se espera que BTC aumente hasta la línea de resistencia del canal. Este objetivo se encuentra actualmente cerca de los 57.000$.

Recuento de ondas

El recuento de ondas más probable sugiere que BTC está en la quinta y última onda (naranja) de un impulso alcista. El objetivo más probable para la parte superior del movimiento se encuentra entre $67,869-$71,884.

El recuento de subondas se muestra en negro. Un descenso por debajo del mínimo de la sub-onda dos en $42,300 invalidaría este recuento de onda en particular e indicaría que BTC está corrigiendo en su lugar.

Conclusión

Se espera que el Bitcoin aumente al menos hasta que llegue a la parte superior del canal paralelo cerca de $57,000. Una ruptura del canal probablemente llevaría a un nuevo precio máximo histórico.

 

Ethereum price (ETH) was invented by Vitalik Buterin and is a great blockchain for smart contracts, dapps and even token creations. The picture shows a metal coin of Ethereum in front of a price curve.

Ethereum price scraping its all-time high. Is the number 2 finally ready to join Bitcoin’s price to set new record highs?

 

The Ethereum price seems to have finally broken out of a weeks-long consolidation phase today. This consolidation led to a formation that resembles an ascending triangle on the 4-hour chart, but is not one. Nevertheless, resistance crystallised with Bitcoin Method the last high at around $1,350, which has now been broken through and tends to offer room for further upward growth.

 

Ethereum price breaks through resistance at $1,350

ETH/USD chart on a 4-H basis. Source: Tradingview

Ethereum price with further upward momentum

Many Ethereum investors are eagerly waiting for ETH to follow Bitcoin’s (BTC) lead and make significant new all-time highs. With today’s upswing in the Ethereum price, this goal is within reach.

 

The SuperTrend indicator supports the optimistic outlook. This technical metric showed a „long“ signal within the same time frame when Ethereum broke through resistance at $1,290. The bullish formation suggests that ETH still has more room to the upside.

 

Current bybit action for new depositors

 

It is worth noting that the last time the SuperTrend index triggered a buy signal on the 4-hour chart was in late December. This leads to a 115% upside rally for ETH.

 

Still, the Fibonacci retracement indicator sees another major hurdle for Ethereum. The all-time high from mid-January 2018 at $1,420 could pose a threat to the upswing in the Ethereum price, at least in the short term. Only if a 4-hour candle closes above this level is a rise into higher territory likely.

 

Possible downside potential for ETH

A pullback could occur if the Ethereum price fails to break above the resistance marked by the all-time high. Under these circumstances, the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level becomes a crucial flashpoint for ETH’s trend, as it could lead to a bounce or a complete reversal.

 

This bearish scenario is also supported by the fact that the RSI indicator signals that Ethereum price is currently as overbought as it last was at the end of 2017.

 

Ethereum price on the weekly chart.

ETH/USD chart on a weekly basis. Source: Tradingview

Regardless, the downtrend appears to be capped at the $1,120 support level as selling pressure behind Ethereum continues to drop dramatically.

 

Graph showing the growth of ETH held on non-exchange wallets

Growth of ETH held on non-exchange wallets. Source: Twitter, Santiment

For example, Santiment already saw a 21% increase in the number of ETH tokens held by non-exchange wallets last week.

The sale of bonds reinforces MicroStrategy’s conviction that Bitcoin is an investment opportunity of this generation.

MicroStrategy (MSTR), a leading business intelligence company, announced on Friday that it raised $650 million in convertible bonds to fund more Bitcoin (BTC) purchases, reinforcing CEO Michael Saylor’s belief in the key digital asset.

The company confirmed on Friday that it sold $650 million in senior convertible notes at a rate of 0.750% maturing in 2025. The interest rate is paid semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, starting in 2021.

According to the press release:

„MicroStrategy intends to invest the net proceeds from the sale of the notes in Bitcoin Blueprint in accordance with its Treasury Reserve Policy, pending the identification of working capital needs and other general corporate purposes.

The securities were issued under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and will be available to institutional investors only.

The increase was finalized a few days after the company announced its plans to leverage the bond resources to acquire more Bitcoin. As the Cointelegraph previously reported, MicroStrategy initially aimed for a $400 million increase. For $650 million, the company can purchase over 36,300 BTC at current prices.

MicroStrategy shocked the world earlier this year when it announced it would convert most of its balance sheet to Bitcoin. At the time, CEO Michael Saylor said his company was sitting on a „$500 million melting ice cube“ of money.

The company currently operates 40,824 BTC, representing more than $734 million. This represents a gain of almost $260 million from the basic purchase price.

Wall Street analysts are concerned that MicroStrategy has become overexposed to Bitcoin, whose decade of volatility kept many institutional investors on the sidelines until very recently. Citbank recently downgraded MSTR to „sell“ from „neutral“ because of its „disproportionate“ BTC focus.

MicroStrategy may be the largest holder of corporate Bitcoins, but it is not alone. On Thursday, Massachusetts-based insurer MassMutual announced that it has purchased $100 million in BTC for its general investment account, making it one of the largest corporate holders. Publicly traded companies such as Galaxy Digital (GLXY), Square (SQ) and Hut 8 Mining Corp (Hut-8) invested between US$36 million and US$134 million in Bitcoin. Each company now has significant profits.

DeFi Money Market (DMM) enables returns with NFTs

A few days ago, DeFi Money Market (DMM) launched a new type of non-fungible token (NFT). The NFTs give the owners country-based franchise rights to real assets within the DMM ecosystem – what does this mean in detail?

According to a press release issued by BTC-ECHO, DeFi Money Market introduced a new type of NFT in the USA, Peru, South Korea, Nigeria and France on December 3rd, 2020. Within five minutes all NFTs were already sold out. In the future, however, further NFTs representing real asset Bitcoin Code holdings are expected to be available in other countries.
Display

JustTRADE is the first German provider to offer an all-in-one solution for trading in crypto currencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, …) shares, ETFs and certificates. The website and app are intuitively designed, offer many useful features and are suitable for both beginners and advanced traders. Best of all, there are no transaction costs or network fees.

DeFi Money Market is a new digital currency system that allows anyone to earn a return on their digital assets

This should enable users of DMM to receive a stable return of up to 6.25% per year on their deposited funds. Currently, returns can be achieved with ETH, DAI, USDT and UDSC. The DMG tokens serve on the one hand to combat inflation, as they are based on real assets such as aircraft, vehicles and real estate. In addition, DMG serves as a governance token for the entire DeFi Money Market protocol.

In total, more than 1.5 million DMG have been paid into a contract during the introduction of the new NFTs. These tokens cannot be sold directly, but are bound to a Smart Conract for a longer period of time. In addition, these tokens are used to finance yield-generating assets in the real world.

Gregory Keough, a member of the DMM Foundation, commented on recent developments as follows:

We are pleased to have successfully completed the first introduction of real assets into the DMM ecosystem. The immediate sell-off of the NFTs shows that there is great interest in this type of ecosystem participation.

In addition, DMM has recently entered into a partnership with the DeFi project Chainlink (LINK) to make the protocol more secure.

MPC is a regulated, fee-based model that is almost an exact replica of the current banking system.

From time to time, the crypto community crowns a new king for secure transactions, and the latest king appears to be multiparty computing, or MPC. This year, the adoption of MPC by custodial and non-custodial agents has progressed and gained traction in the market at a very fast pace.

However, it could have a price. MPC providers offer regulators a back door for cryptomoney transactions. As the industry becomes more dependent on MPC for security, it could end up compromising longstanding principles of decentralisation and resistance to censorship.

The hidden features of MPC

To identify where risks exist, let’s briefly review CPM and how it is used. At the most basic level, MPC technology involves dividing private keys into segments and distributing them to different parties. Typically, the client has one key segment and the MPC provider has another. The aim is to improve security by ensuring that neither party has total control over a given transaction, which can only be executed if both parties provide their key segments.

MPC service providers often present their technology as simply helping to secure transactions. It is sold on the premise that: „We keep half a key, you keep the other half, but you are the boss, only you decide when and where to transfer your funds. You can also withdraw all your funds from our account whenever you want“.

But in reality, that is not exactly the case. MPC service providers act as intermediaries whose approval is required for a transaction to be executed.

In this respect, MPC providers are playing a role almost identical to that of banks, with blockchains fulfilling the role played by the SWIFT system. It can replace the sender’s bank with an external MPC service provider and replace the SWIFT system with the blockchain. The only difference here is in how the sender sends the payment. With a bank, the sender instructs the bank to release the funds; with an MPC provider, the sender and the provider jointly sign the transaction. Both parties send a partial key which the MPC service provider then transmits to the block chain.

It could be argued that there is a significant difference between banks and MPC providers that is not taken into account in this comparison: banks can freeze funds and even confiscate them. The problem, however, is that these back doors also exist in MPC providers.

There is no argument here that MPC providers are simply bad guys who want to steal their funds from their clients. As professional and reputable companies working with institutions, they need to meet a major demand from their clients: that crypt funds be recoverable if someone loses their key.

Private key security has long been a point of friction for institutions and crypto-currency companies. Therefore, the ability to recover funds in case of loss of a key is absolutely essential for any company claiming to offer secure storage of cryptomonies. Imagine a bank that wouldn’t let you recover a forgotten password, simply telling you that if you lost it, your money was lost forever.

Here comes the regulator

In light of their responsibility for client funds as a third party, it is clear that MPC providers offer a back door for regulatory intervention. Ultimately, this means that MPC firms could play the same role as banks.

If a legal authority requires an MPC service provider to stop a transaction, it will be forced to do so. In addition, if MPC providers allow users to recover lost keys, it means that a regulator could also issue a lawsuit to confiscate funds. Again, assuming this is a legally binding request, the provider would be forced to comply if it wishes to remain in business.

This is not mere hyperbole. The regulators are already here. In June 2019, the Financial Action Task Force, or FATF, approved an initiative to regulate virtual assets and virtual asset servicers. While overall compliance remains low, we can be confident that the FATF will continue to expand the network until all virtual asset service providers are included.

While the focus of the crypto community has been on how exchanges will administer FATF regulation, MPC providers also fit the profile of a virtual asset service provider, which manages and transfers client funds in a similar manner to a bank wire transfer. The same regulatory conditions apply to all companies that directly or indirectly own, manage or control virtual assets.

Hence, this regulation creates the same expectations in the CPMs as those currently applied to the banking system. In the end, this could mean that large transactions are reported back to the regulator, and customers are subject to the same Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering requirements as for a bank account.

Traditional banks to execute MPC?

If further testing is required, we only have to look at the large banks that have already recognised that MPC technology offers benefits that fit within their existing regulatory frameworks. Citibank and Goldman Sachs have already invested in MPC providers and we can expect many more to be announced very soon. With the United States Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency already having approved crypto currency custody services for federally authorised banks, MPC offers an easy way to regulate banks to begin entering the crypto space.

The fact that MPC service providers limit the mobility of their clients by creating dependence on their own wallets could also be attractive to banks, creating a kind of forced loyalty far removed from the vision of open finance that many in the world cherish in the crypto space.

It is easy to assume that such a network will manage only „authorised“ currencies and coinage. Uncontrolled“ assets, such as your Bitcoin Lifestyle (BTC), will not generate the kind of fees that could be imposed on authorised transactions and could even be banned over time.

To summarise this

On a technical level, MPC is impressive and could be a perfect fit for players who do not have concerns about regulator involvement in the crypto space. However, for those who do, it is worth being aware that it also provides a backdoor to the regulated and centralised cryptosphere in the same way that they are already experiencing regulated and centralised exchanges. This is reason enough to think twice before promoting or using it.

As a final point, it is worth adding that the technology is still in its infancy. A vision exists for the creation of a decentralised MPC, but such a solution is far from being developed. The road is still long and tortuous, but it would be a step in the right direction for those who advocate the original vision of decentralised open networks that support a valuable Internet. I urge you to ask your MPC service provider what happens if you lose your wallet or your seed.

Analitycy rynkowi przypisują nagły wzrost Bitcoina powyżej 19.000 dolarów agresywnemu popytowi ze strony instytucji finansowych i wiodących firm w Stanach Zjednoczonych.

Analitycy wskazują na zapotrzebowanie ze strony instytucji finansowych i spółek notowanych na giełdzie jako główne siły stojące za nagłym ponownym testem Bitcoin Storm na jego wszechobecne rekordy.

„Główną przyczyną stabilnego rozdrobnienia w Bitcon jest zwiększone zainteresowanie i agresywna aktywność zakupowa instytucji“, powiedział Nick Cote z hazardowej platformy handlowej Hxro Labs. „Wielu inwestorów przechodzi przez Grayscale.“

Rosnący popyt instytucjonalny widać w silnej akumulacji Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust, z udziałem funduszu BTC przekraczającym 500.000 na początku tego miesiąca.

Cote powiedział również, że czołowe amerykańskie firmy, takie jak Square i Microstrategy, „umieszczają BTC w swoich księgach jako zabezpieczenie przed inflacją i złym zarządzaniem polityką pieniężną przez banki centralne“. Opisał to zachowanie jako napędzające „pętlę pozytywnego sprzężenia zwrotnego“ na rynkach:

„Bitcoin będzie się oczywiście wycofywał, ale tak długo jak instytucje będą wierzyć w to, że narracja Bitcoina jest używana jako magazyn wartości lub zabezpieczenie przed inflacją, staje się ona pozytywną pętlą sprzężenia zwrotnego“.

Szef NEM handlu Nicholas Pelecanos zgodził się, stwierdzając, że podstawy Bitcoinu są teraz silniejsze niż kiedykolwiek wcześniej, wskazując na post-halving dynamiki podaży, wzrost adopcji instytucjonalnej, oraz szereg „publicznie notowanych amerykańskich spółek przenoszących 10% swojego bilansu do aktywów“.

Pelecanos oczekuje obecnie wzrostu na rynkach altcoinów, stwierdzając: „BTC powróciła do rekordowego poziomu, ale warto zwrócić uwagę na wycenę altcoinów, które wciąż są średnio o 50% niższe od swoich rekordowych wartości“.

Pelecanos ostrzegł, że pomimo jego byczej perspektywy dla altówek, wiele alternatywnych walut kryptograficznych nie zyskało znaczącego poparcia, stwierdzając:

„Niektóre altcoiny reprezentują projekty, które już nie funkcjonują, ale inne odnotowały ogromny rozwój zarówno w zakresie adopcji, jak i technologii.“

Analitycy zwrócili również uwagę na bycze sygnały płynące z rynków górniczych, a dyrektor techniczny Glassnode, Rafael Schultze-Kraft, zauważył, że od marca górnicy zgromadzili dodatkowe 10.000 BTC.

Czy górnicy sprzedają więcej #BTC po tych cenach?

Nie wydaje mi się.

Niewydana podaż górników (nigdy nie została przeniesiona) ma tendencję wzrostową od czasu krachu w marcu.

Od tego czasu wzrosła o ponad 10.000 $BTC.#Bitcoin

Wykres: https://t.co/pXcLqwr5QD pic.twitter.com/wreZg9fdIw
– Rafael Schultze-Kraft (@n3ocortex) 25 listopada 2020 r.

Przychody górników również ostatnio osiągnęły rekordowy poziom od początku roku, po odzyskaniu poziomu sprzed wydobycia, a ich dzienne przychody przekroczyły 20 milionów dolarów.

A adoção do Bitcoin pela MicroStrategy como seu principal ativo de reserva tomou o mercado de assalto, com muitos argumentando que o desenvolvimento foi um dos catalisadores por trás do BTC subindo para US $ 19 mil nas paradas. Michael Saylor, da empresa, falou recentemente sobre o Bitcoin e a decisão de sua empresa de investir no Bitcoin, que agora aumentou em mais de 182%. Deve-se notar aqui que, embora o investimento da MicroStrategy não tenha sido o primeiro, ele gerou um efeito cascata que levou outras empresas a fazer o mesmo.

Vamos conversar sobre por que isso funcionou e por que agora, vamos?

Antes de responder „Por que funcionou“, vamos dar uma olhada em „Por que agora“.

Porque agora?

Os bancos centrais de todo o mundo imprimiram trilhões de moeda fiduciária para aliviar os problemas causados ​​pela pandemia. Enquanto esses bancos estavam tentando evitar um desastre massivo e uma recessão que levaria anos para voltar ao normal, ele voltará para assombrar a todos, até mesmo os bancos que o publicaram.

Na verdade, no momento em que este artigo foi escrito, os títulos rendiam menos de 1% nos retornos médios, enquanto o mercado de ações estava em alta. Portanto, parecia não haver hedge, caso o mercado de ações quebrasse.

Esta é a razão pela qual se pode argumentar que a carteira 60-40 já encontrou seu fim.

Como consequência do mesmo, há uma necessidade extrema de preservar a riqueza e, portanto, existem duas opções restantes – ouro ou Bitcoin.

Claramente, Bitcoin é a melhor opção.

Por que funcionou?

Bem, agora é o melhor momento para empresas como a MS preservarem seu patrimônio. E que melhor maneira de fazer isso do que investir em algo que não perde valor com o tempo?

Conforme explicado por Saylor, se as reservas de caixa da MS fossem mantidas em dinheiro, elas seriam reembolsadas em mais de 10-15% ao ano, até o ponto em que os retornos futuros seriam anulados.

“Somos uma empresa de software que gera caixa, mas se simplesmente transferirmos o dinheiro para a moeda fiduciária…. então ele iria rebaixar 15% ao ano. Estaríamos perdendo tanto quanto geramos no PNL. ”

Coinbase a subi de multiples pannes depuis mars, coïncidant souvent avec des jours de négociation Bitcoin volatils.

Coinbase semble avoir un problème de capacité

Les utilisateurs ont souligné pendant des années que lorsque le Crypto Cash et d’autres actifs cryptographiques sont particulièrement volatils, l’échange se déconnecte parfois sans avertissement. Ces pannes peuvent empêcher les clients d’acheter ou de vendre leurs actifs cryptographiques et sont généralement perçues défavorablement par les traders.

Entre mars et novembre, la bourse a enregistré neuf problèmes différents menant à divers types de pannes ou de problèmes de connectivité, bien que l’impact direct sur les clients soit quelque peu incertain dans certains cas. Les problèmes varient apparemment dans leur degré de gravité. La principale mise à jour de statut publiée par Coinbase pendant ces périodes est la suivante: «Coinbase.com rencontre des problèmes de connectivité.»

Quatre de ces cas ont coïncidé avec une action volatile des prix Bitcoin, selon des bougies de prix de 30 minutes sur TradingView.com

Le 29 avril, Coinbase a signalé des problèmes de connectivité. Dans une mise à jour de son statut publiée plus tard, Coinbase.com semble avoir subi des problèmes entre 10h00 et 12h30 PDT ce jour-là. Le prix du Bitcoin a évolué de 4,54% pendant cette période. Cointelegraph a déjà signalé des difficultés de plate-forme observées ce jour-là.

Le 9 mai, Coinbase a informé le public d’une autre difficulté , déclarant à nouveau: «Coinbase.com rencontre des problèmes de connectivité.» Cette fois, le prix de Bitcoin a évolué de 15,26% entre 17h00 et 18h00 PDT – la fenêtre horaire montrant des difficultés, en fonction du statut, qui comprenait également des détails supplémentaires publiés plusieurs jours après.

Le troisième cas en corrélation avec l’action notable des prix Bitcoin s’est produit le 1er juin, lorsque Coinbase a de nouveau informé le public de problèmes de connectivité. Cet incident a apparemment eu un impact sur les utilisateurs à un certain niveau entre 16h00 et 17h00 PDT, période pendant laquelle le prix du Bitcoin a augmenté de 6,94%. Les jours suivant cet incident particulier, certains clients de Coinbase ont quitté la plate-forme , à en juger par les retraits de Bitcoin et signalés par Cointelegraph le 9 juin.

Coinbase a également subi un autre problème de connectivité le 28 juillet entre 2h00 et 4h30 PDT, au cours duquel le prix du Bitcoin a évolué de 3,82%.

Cependant, tous les problèmes de Coinbase n’ont pas coïncidé avec les grandes journées de fluctuation des prix de la BTC. Coinbase a informé le public de problèmes le 16 novembre, déclarant : „Le site Web et les applications mobiles ne se chargent pas.“ Le prix du Bitcoin n’a évolué qu’environ 1,72% pendant la fenêtre de temps indiquée pour les problèmes, bien que cela ait suffi à provoquer plus d’indignation au sein de la communauté commerciale. Des problèmes de connectivité sont également survenus les 28 mai , 17 juillet , 18 août et 11 novembre , au cours desquels le prix du Bitcoin a changé de moins de 3% lors de chaque incident.